--by Rob Sethre, Photizo Group, Sr. Consultant
A curious press statement released this week by the Printing Industries of America Association (PIA) was cause for some confusion and discussion. The trigger event was a routine announcement by Hewlett Packard regarding their MPS activities.
See the entire announcement here:
http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/090713b.html
PIA took obvious offense at this announcement and issued a stern statement in response.
Here is a sample of the tone of the announcement:
“It is with disappointment, therefore, that Printing Industries of America learned of HP's latest offering -- managed print services, which was advertised with great fanfare in this morning's Wall Street Journal. ‘We are always concerned when a major vendor in our industry deviates from its core offerings to venture into managing print solutions, which the private sector has competitively provided for hundreds of years,’ notes Michael Makin, President and CEO of Printing Industries of America.”
See the entire statement here:
Most readers will be somewhat puzzled when trying to put the pieces together. Hundreds of years? Deviating from their core offerings? Less polite commentators will probably have their comments and criticisms at the ready to expose the association’s [choose your own extreme descriptor].
But actually all we have here is a case of mistaken identity.
In past years, there were certainly different perceptions and definitions surrounding the topic of Managed Print Services. Even today, discussions are ongoing to achieve a (more or less) uniform understanding of the MPS concept. We may not have reached that final goal yet, but most industry participants would presumably agree that we are getting close. In spite of a lively ongoing discussion, most of the differences involve nuances as opposed to totally different understandings of the MPS concept.
Or so we thought . . . . Just when we had achieved some recent progress, this new event reminds us how far we are from a generally accepted definition for MPS. Possibly even more surprising, there appear to be even two completely separate and independent areas of usage by two groups that are hardly known to each other.
On the one side, we have the printer/MPF vendors and channel partners. Managed Print Services, as mentioned, has evolved into an increasingly uniform definition to cover print consulting, hardware, consumables, services, applications, fleet monitoring and continuous improvement of document output flows.
On the other side, we have the world of commercial printers. While the key trend here is the transition from analogue to digital print job management, the same MPS phrase has emerged, yet with a totally different meaning. Complementing the traditional print providers, companies like Innerworkings, WorkflowOne and NewlineNoosh provide virtual print procurement, production and fulfillment. And these offerings have also been labeled Managed Print Services.
Providers of Managed Print and Promotional Marketing Services
*****************
PITNEY BOWES FORMS STRATEGIC ALLIANCE WITH NEWLINENOOSH TO EXPAND MANAGED SERVICES FOR PRINT
-- Relationship Leverages Companies' Managed Services Expertise --
*****************
And now the real source of discontent: MarketSplash (http://www.marketsplash.com/res/home.html).
This is a service introduced by HP not too long ago that enables web-based print job submission, production and fulfillment. Following the launch of the MarketSplash service there was a great deal of discussion among industry players as well as between them and HP. The concern was that the production and fulfillment segments would be increasingly monopolized by HP, to the detriment of the independent printers.
The MarketSplash initiative has been viewed with a high level of skepticism by the commercial printing industry. Whether the concern is justified or downright paranoid is difficult to judge, but obviously that experience raised the level of sensitivity in that sector. So when a new HP initiative involving MPS was announced, they felt it was necessary to make a clear statement and address the issue. But the issue addressed was actually not at all related to MarketSplash, the commercial printing industry or their separate definition of MPS.
That is the nature of mistaken identities. They may have realized their mistake by now, but nonetheless the event draws attention to the need for clarification.
Blame the industry for not coordinating their concepts and definitions. In our own perspective and opinion, the MPS concept that is gaining strong momentum currently is the task of managing decentralized printer/MFP fleets. I wager that this will most likely be the future common understanding and definition. The commercial printing sector can choose their phrases as they wish, and without meaning any ill, that parallel concept and definition of MPS will presumably have to be redefined or at least renamed.
Insight, Perspective, and Success for the Managed Print Services Market



